<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up and Running</title>
	<link>http://edvaizey.mpblogs.com/2007/02/26/up-and-running/</link>
	<description>MP for Wantage and Didcot</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  6 Jul 2008 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Luke Smith</title>
		<link>http://edvaizey.mpblogs.com/2007/02/26/up-and-running/#comment-5216</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://edvaizey.mpblogs.com/2007/02/26/up-and-running/#comment-5216</guid>
					<description>Hello Ed's readers,

We are part of the arts establishment, but we still welcome open debate about the future of arts funding in England. A lively debate is already underway at &lt;a href="www.artsdebate.co.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.artsdebate.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; -- Arts Council England's first ever public value enquiry. Can we look forward to lively interaction between these projects?

thanks,

Luke Smith, Project Manager, The Arts Debate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ed&#8217;s readers,</p>
<p>We are part of the arts establishment, but we still welcome open debate about the future of arts funding in England. A lively debate is already underway at <a href="www.artsdebate.co.uk" rel="nofollow">www.artsdebate.co.uk</a> &#8212; Arts Council England&#8217;s first ever public value enquiry. Can we look forward to lively interaction between these projects?</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>Luke Smith, Project Manager, The Arts Debate
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
