Arts Council Cuts
We’re calling for a moratorium on the Arts Council cuts - you can read my piece here - on the Grauniad’s website, naturally.
Ed Vaizey
MP for Wantage and Didcot
MP for Wantage and Didcot
We’re calling for a moratorium on the Arts Council cuts - you can read my piece here - on the Grauniad’s website, naturally.
UK Daily Pundit said on January 14th, 2008 at 6:39 pm:
Cuts in arts funding? A non-issue. The London Mozart Players losing their funding? Never heard of them. And neither has anybody else. Sorry, Ed, but in the real world no-one gives a hoot.
Tizzy said on January 14th, 2008 at 8:06 pm:
Coincidentally, as I was linking to this site, I was reading the piece in today’s online Indie on the protest outside the Nat Gallery re the mini-airport at Siena in an attempt to Save Siena from the hoi polloi.
Thank God for Gormley.
BTW, any idea when the results from the Art’s Debate will be published? Have you seen a draft version?
Conand said on January 14th, 2008 at 8:34 pm:
Hey Mr Ed, your blog page has gone somewhat avant-garde. ‘Everything is italics’ 2008 by Vaizey.
Oh and the link the Graudniad article doesn’t work.
Conand said on January 14th, 2008 at 8:35 pm:
Whoops, only the word ‘here’ is hypertext. Sowwy. Doh!
canvas said on January 14th, 2008 at 9:17 pm:
Commercialism, orthodoxy and taste are the enemies of art.
As our society gets more and more materialistic we tend to overlook the importance of art.
Perhaps Sir John Tusa explains it best:
“The arts matter because they are local and relevant to the needs and wishes of local people. They help citizens to express their needs and to clothe them in memorable forms. They offer a way of expressing ideas and wishes that ordinary politics do not allow. The arts regenerate the rundown and rehabilitate the neglected. Arts buildings lift the spirits, create symbols that people identify with, and give identity to places that may not have one. Where the arts start, jobs follow. Anywhere that neglects the arts shortchanges its people.”
“Now all of that is true. The arts have acted as a pole of economic and social regeneration in many places. At the same time, it is worth insisting (as the architect David Chipperfield has pointed out) that while the arts may be a necessary condition of post-industrial regeneration, they are not a sufficient condition. The so-called Bilbao effect was not achieved primarily by building Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim museum. That building followed a period of sustained local-government investment in infrastructure, including a new underground system.”
“The final value of the arts cannot be predicted or quantified; to curtail them on these grounds is to deny the possibility of an unpredictable benefit. The risk of funding the arts offers benefits far greater than the immediate gains of not funding them. The arts link society to its past, a people to its inherited store of ideas, images and words; yet the arts challenge those links in order to find ways of exploring new paths and ventures. The arts are evolutionary and revolutionary; they listen, recall and lead. They resist the homogeneous, strengthen the individual and are independent in the face of the pressures of the mass, the bland, the undifferentiated. In a postmodern world, in which individual creativity has never mattered more, the arts provide the opportunity for developing this characteristic. The investment in the arts is so small, the actual return so large, that it represents value as research into ideas.”